Forest Products Industry

British Columbian Premier David Eby has unveiled new measures aimed at protecting British Columbians, workers, and businesses from US President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Canadian goods and energy.  Source: CFNRFM “The White House started a trade war we didn’t want, and we must answer with strength,” Premier Eby stated. “We are responding to this unprecedented attack with several targeted actions and, in the coming weeks, will arm ourselves with even more tools to counter sustained economic aggression.” The BC government plans to introduce new tariff-response legislation in the coming days, which will provide the province with enhanced tools to safeguard jobs and businesses and respond quickly to the challenges brought about by Trump’s tariffs. Among the proposed actions are measures to remove interprovincial trade barriers, require that low-carbon fuels added to gasoline and diesel be produced in Canada, and enable B.C. to apply tolls or fees to US commercial vehicles traveling through the province to Alaska. Premier Eby emphasized that Trump’s tariffs were a “profound mistake” that are harming families on both sides of the border. “My team will continue to work hard every day to defend British Columbians through this and come out stronger on the other side. Every option is on the table,” he said. In the short term, the BC government has directed the BC Liquor Distribution Branch to halt purchases of American liquor from “red” states and remove those brands from public liquor store shelves. Furthermore, the provincial government and Crown corporations are now required to prioritize purchasing Canadian goods and services. These initial responses are part of a broader “Team Canada” approach, which includes federal 25% tariffs on Can$155 billion worth of US imports, as well as additional actions from other provinces and territories. The BC government has also committed to reducing barriers to internal trade and labour mobility, with a target of June 1, 2025. The province’s strategy to combat the tariffs includes: Implementing strong counter-measures and reaching out to American decision-makers; Strengthening BC’s economy by accelerating project approvals and supporting industries and workers; Diversifying trade markets for BC products, reducing reliance on US markets by eliminating domestic trade barriers. To support these efforts, BC is pushing forward with major projects valued at Can$20 billion in investments, expected to create 8,000 jobs, particularly in rural and remote areas. To ensure coordinated and swift action, Premier Eby has formed a trade and economic security task force to bring together business, labour, and Indigenous leaders. A new agriculture and food economy task force will focus on maintaining the growth of BC’s food sector despite tariffs. A BC softwood advisory council is also working on a strategy to address the ongoing softwood lumber dispute. Quick Facts: US tariffs on Canadian mineral exports are projected to cost American companies over US$11 billion and significantly impact the US defense, energy, and manufacturing sectors. The share of BC’s goods exports to the USvdropped to 52.8% in 2024, compared to 65.8% in 2000. Meanwhile, BC has been expanding its trade with key Asian markets, including China and South Korea. While BC is relatively better positioned than other provinces due to its lower reliance on US nexports, the impact of the tariffs will still be significant. BC remains highly reliant on US markets for certain exports, including natural gas, electricity, and softwood lumber. US imports make up 34.5% of B.C.’s total incoming trade, including machinery, equipment, agriculture, food, and energy products.  

Russia’s attacks on Ukraine’s territorial integrity have now persisted for more than a decade – the occupation of Crimea in 2014 marked its 11th anniversary at the end of February 2025, and this week marks the third anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion. Source: Timberbiz For many Ukrainians, this has meant immeasurable suffering and deprivation. Nevertheless, life continues in many parts of the country. Particularly in regions not directly affected by the war, people and businesses are working on the country’s economic development. This also applies to forestry and its evolution toward greater ecological and social sustainability. FSC Ukraine works tirelessly on new standards and on establishing progressive forestry practices in a battered country. Still, it means working under difficult conditions – working in a country at war. Since 2022, a lot has changed for the FSC Ukraine team. Meeting the demanding ecological, social, and economic requirements of the certification system while maintaining operations during wartime seemed impossible, especially in the beginning. Yet challenges breed innovation and flexibility. Hybrid work, adjustments to increase security for operational activities – such as working online in shelters during air raids – and the dedicated commitment of on-site staff to maintain communication with certificate holders, partners, and stakeholders in the country and worldwide. “Even in wartime, we haven’t refused a single request, though occasionally we must postpone or cancel planned meetings. Everyone should be able to rely on us as FSC representatives fulfilling our mission in the country, even under these extraordinary circumstances,” said Pavlo Kravets, Director of FSC Ukraine. Anyone who experiences the Ukrainian conflict primarily through television and other news channels, can hardly imagine that work can continue in such a country. However, one must not forget that fighting does not occur in all parts of the country. In fact, most FSC-certified forest areas are in western Ukraine, while most military actions have so far taken place in the south-east of the country (see map below). Amidst economic challenges, wood processing companies still operating in Ukraine offer European stakeholders an opportunity to import high-quality FSC-certified materials, especially now that traditional sources from Russia and Belarus are no longer available (certificates were terminated due to war actions, and materials from Russia and Belarus are prohibited in FSC supply chains). It is, moreover, an opportunity to support the Ukrainian economy. Natalia Pokinska, Managing Director of Kronospan UA LLC, one of the country’s largest wood-based panel manufacturers, told FSC International: “Currently, FSC certification is not only important but essential to support the Ukrainian economy and create jobs for those who haven’t migrated and those who have been relocated. Wood processing plants and furniture factories have almost lost their local markets. It is therefore urgently necessary to find new customers abroad.” Everyday central FSC topics such as occupational safety take on an entirely different dimension when viewed in the light of armed conflicts. A central priority for the FSC team in Ukraine is therefore continuous engagement with the National indicators in the FSC Forest Stewardship Standard to take account of the changing realities of war. The new FSC Forest Stewardship Standard for Ukraine took effect in September 2024. Pavlo Kravets explained that “as the war affects both on-site work in the forest and how companies operate, we’ve worked hard to adapt our standards to remain demanding while accounting for the circumstances.” Beyond economically, socially, and ecologically sustainable forestry, FSC makes an important contribution to workplace health and safety for forest workers. For instance, Ukraine’s national FSC standard excludes war zones and mined forest areas from management to ensure the safety of forest workers. “Ukraine is under the observation of the entire world, and the fact that FSC Ukraine contributes to the safety of forest workers under such difficult conditions is key to preserving forests for future generations and the development of society,” said Volodymyr Tkachuk, Chairman of the Ukrainian Forest Workers’ Union. Domestically, the four-person team of FSC Ukraine advocates for certified businesses by seeking dialogue with national stakeholders and engaging the FSC network, which includes members of FSC International and FSC offices in many countries. But there is also activity beyond the country’s borders. The first “ReBuild Ukraine” meeting took place in Warsaw in 2023. This international specialist event focuses on rebuilding Ukraine after the destruction caused by the war. It brings together representatives from business, politics, and humanitarian organisations to discuss solutions for rebuilding residential buildings, energy supply, and other infrastructure, the goal is to promote investments and international partnerships to support sustainable and resilient development of the country. In 2024, FSC International also participated in Rebuild Ukraine with a delegation of country representatives from Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia to represent their Ukrainian colleagues, who did not receive travel authorisation. Wood is an essential raw material for climate-friendly, resilient, and resource-conserving reconstruction. The Ukrainian government plans to advance the decarbonisation of the construction sector through increased use of wood to replace cement and steel, among other things. At the 2024 ReBuild Ukraine an online event, ‘European Initiatives on Sustainable Constructing with Wood: Experience and Lessons for Ukraine’, stressed the part that could be played by certified wood in particular. It summarised the results of ‘The Role of Wood Construction in Ukraine’s Recovery: Overview of Strategies and Initiatives,’ a study commissioned by FSC Ukraine. That study highlighted the current obstacles and opportunities for using wood to decarbonise the construction sector and analysed the positions of the Ukrainian government, the European Union, international financial institutions, and civil society on using wood in reconstruction projects. Over 60 interested participants followed the presentations by the team from Ukraine, who joined online. Especially in light of reconstruction, new perspectives will emerge for the Ukrainian forestry sector, including with regard to the EU Green Deal and initiatives such as the New European Bauhaus and the related likely increase in “climate conditioning” in reconstruction financing. However, while many donors, construction companies, and architects recognise the benefits of wood in rebuilding the country, there is a lack of effective communication channels through which […]

Between 2022 and 2023, in the first two years of the Ukrainian war, almost 1,600 square kilometres of forests were destroyed. The scale of devastation, along with its environmental, social, and economic consequences, is difficult to quantify. Source: PhysOrg Between 2022 and 2023, in the first two years of the Ukrainian war, almost 1,600 square kilometres of forests were destroyed. The scale of devastation, along with its environmental, social, and economic consequences, is difficult to quantify. According to the analysis system developed by the researchers, Ukraine lost 808 square kilometres of forest in 2022 and 772 square kilometres in 2023, mainly in war-torn regions: 180 square kilometres in Donetsk Oblast, 181 square kilometres in Kharkiv Oblast, 214 square kilometres in Kherson Oblast, 268 square kilometres in Kyiv Oblast, and 195 square kilometres in Luhansk Oblast. Researchers believe fire is the main cause of forest loss. In March 2022, for instance, many forest fires were detected in the Kherson Oblast, and Russian troops tried to hinder attempts to extinguish the flames. The valuable biodiversity hotspot of Cape Kinburn, in the southern part of the Mykolaiv Oblast, is another example: fires are estimated to have destroyed between 20–30% of the area, which is now occupied by the Russian military. “When the war ends, there will be a need for strong and efficient environmental policies to stop biodiversity loss, promote reforestation and restore ecosystems,” Cazzolla Gatti said. “Reforested areas may contribute to the creation of ecological humanitarian corridors and support demilitarization, creating buffer zones to build and preserve peace.” The study authors include Roberto Cazzolla Gatti, Rocío Beatriz Cortés Lobos and Duccio Rocchini from the University of Bologna, together with Michele Torresani from the Free University of Bozen-Bolzano.

Two years on from Cyclone Gabrielle, Pan Pac’s beloved 1934 Plymouth Coupe vintage car is once again cruising the roads of Hawke’s Bay in New Zealand following an enormous restoration effort by staff. Source: Timberbiz Like most of the vehicles parked at Pan Pac’s Whirinaki site during Cyclone Gabrielle, the Plymouth was left caked in silt and severely flood damaged. Its engine was sitting on a bench in the Vehicle Workshop and was in the process of being reconditioned. Unfortunately, it too was below the water level. Paul Tollison works as an operator in the sawmill and has a passion for cars. He volunteered to restore the Plymouth while the mills were non-operational during the cyclone recovery. Mr Tollison dedicated more than 700 hours to meticulously restoring the Plymouth to its former glory. The trickiest part was getting everything ready for re-certification, he says. “Every last nut, bolt and component has had to be pulled apart, cleaned up, rebuilt and put back together… It took me two ten-hour shifts to get the silt out of the carburettor. “Some of it’s been very frustrating, and some of it’s been very, very rewarding.” Some of the parts weren’t so easily sourced, like the carburettor kit, which a staff member’s brother located and sent over from Australia. “Unless you look closely, you won’t notice some of the parts aren’t original, like the new LED headlights,” Mr Tollison said. Pan Pac Managing Director, Tony Clifford, said the restoration went ahead because of how special the car is to Pan Pac. “The Plymouth is part of Pan Pac’s DNA,” he said. “This restoration wouldn’t have been financially viable if it was done at commercial rates,’ Mr Clifford said. “It was only thanks to Paul’s discretionary time that we were able to rebuild and keep the Plymouth.” Little is known about the car up until the late 1970s, when it was purchased by former Pan Pac director Masa Asai, who took it with him when he returned to Pan Pac’s parent company, Oji, in Japan. It was never registered in Japan and sat in a garage for 25 years. After a change in circumstances, Mr Asai donated the car to Pan Pac, and had it shipped back to New Zealand. Over the years, the car has been popular with staff, who enjoy taking it out for a spin on the weekend and using on special occasions like weddings and the Art Deco Festival. Pan Pac is grateful to Mr Tollison, and the other staff who helped him save this much-loved company treasure.  

Despite Safe Work Australia’s ongoing efforts to raise awareness on the importance of safety in the workplace, accidents still occur too frequently on a national scale. Source: Timberbiz In 2023 alone 200 Australian workers died from traumatic injuries at work, according to Safe Work Australia. More than 1880 traumatic injury fatalities were reported in Australian workplaces in the past 10 years and more than 1,165,100 workers submitted a serious workers’ compensations claim. The majority of those injured or killed were male machinery operators, drivers, or labourers. Preventable incidents, within workplace traffic management particularly, not only has devastating effects on those injured but also on their families and their workplaces. Recent traffic incidents within the timber and hardware industry have highlighted the critical need for simple but effective Workplace Health and Safety (WHS) systems, particularly in high-risk areas where vehicles, machinery, and pedestrians interact. No industry, especially ours, is immune. The consequences of inaction are dire. The reality is stark: these incidents can and do happen and they are preventable. Even in workplaces with experienced teams, a single oversight can lead to life-changing injuries. Although WHS procedures are implemented by businesses, team leaders often fail to revisit these plans or adapt them to evolving risks. To create safer workplaces in 2025 NTHA is urging all members to act now and create better traffic management systems by implementing the following: Review and update traffic management plans: Regularly assess your workplace layout to identify all hazards and the risks associated with vehicle and pedestrian interactions. Implement driver exclusion zones: Designate driver safety areas and enforce no-go zones for truck drivers during loading and unloading activities. Define forklift safety zones: Use clear signage and lines to indicate where forklifts operate to reduce the risk of collisions. Identify safe loading and unloading zones: Ensure clear zones with at least three metres of access around forklifts to enhance visibility, safety and minimise risks. Train and educate employees: Ensure all workers understand the importance of safety protocols. Conduct regular training sessions to reinforce vigilance and drive change. Safety is not a one-time task; it is an ongoing commitment. Waiting for an incident to happen before acting is a gamble no business can afford. By proactively reviewing safety measures, engaging your team in open discussions about risks, and seeking expert guidance, you will reduce workplace accidents and create a safer workplace. For easy to follow guidance with hazard reviews, traffic management plans, or WHS training tailored to your business, contact NTHA. Together, we can ensure that every worker goes home safely at the end of the day because safety is everyone’s right and responsibility. For support reach out directly to NTHA WHS/HR Manager Vicki Stableford or WHS Specialist Graeme Burchall.  

Two new projects run by Skill Insight and ForestWorks are underway to support skills development in manual tree felling with a chainsaw. Source: Timberbiz They follow the 2023-24 Tree Felling Project, which reviewed and updated three units for manual tree felling. During that project, there was strong industry support for the addition of prerequisites to the units, to ensure learners have the necessary experience before enrolling. However, this was not within the scope of that project and required additional time to investigate. Adding prerequisites to the units presents challenges in maintaining their accessibility and reaching a consensus on the appropriate prerequisites to use. Manual tree felling using a chainsaw is a crucial skill across arboriculture, emergency services, land management, and forestry. It is important that anyone learning these skills already possesses certain preliminary skills before undertaking training in tree felling, so they remain safe throughout their learning, assessment and future employment. For instance, learners should have chainsaw handling skills before training in basic tree felling and they should have the skills to fell a standard tree before training to fell complex trees. Pathway to tree felling skills project Skills Insight and ForestWorks are undertaking this project to investigate the addition of prerequisites to the tree felling units or alternative mechanisms to ensure learners who enroll in tree felling possess the necessary skills. The team will engage with the Training Package Assurance Body and State Training Authorities to seek advice on the feasibility of prerequisites and how to best support learner safety given the high-risk of the activity and variability in delivery across training providers and industries. Consultation will also take place with employers, registered training organisations and unions from across relevant industries to understand the various viewpoints on the issue. Out of this, we will draft recommendations and an activity plan to support skill development in tree felling while promoting safety and adherence to delivery standards. Feedback will be collected on the recommendations and activity plan to check they are in line with stakeholder needs and expectations. A report including this information will be submitted to the Department of Employment and Workforce Relations to inform future work to strengthen the tree felling units and their delivery. Further details about the project team and timeline will be available soon. Tree allocation partnerships project Skills Insight and ForestWorks are undertaking this project to develop a mechanism for sourcing trees for delivery of the tree felling units. In consultation with stakeholders, we will investigate ways to establish partnerships between RTOs and organisations that can facilitate access to trees, such as forestry companies, councils, landowners, national parks services and other relevant stakeholders. The team will consult to understand existing partnerships, practices and regulations relating to tree allocation, as well as the challenges associated with each. From here, we will develop protocols and guidelines to support partnerships for identifying, allocating, and managing trees for training purposes, which will be tested with a small selection of RTOs and stakeholders. Implementation support materials and a virtual workshop will be developed to help roll out the protocol to a broader cohort of stakeholders. Our team will follow up with participants to assess the effectiveness of the protocol and produce a report outlining these findings. The project aims to support continued delivery of the tree felling units, so that all workers are equipped with the skills to safely fell trees using a chainsaw. Further details about the project team and timeline will be available soon.  

The Gottstein Trust is offering six fully paid conference places at the upcoming World Conference on Timber Engineering (WCTE), being held in Brisbane in late June. Source: Timberbiz These conference scholarships are available for Australian engineers in the early stages of their professional careers. The WCTE global organising committee is led by Professor Keith Crews. A prominent timber research leader, he is the director of the Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Research Hub to Advance Timber in Australia’s Built Environment, hosted at the University of Queensland. A specialist in research and design of large-scale timber structures he’s internationally recognised as an expert on Sustainable Infrastructure. Prof Crews is a former Gottstein Fellow and a valued contributor to the Gottstein Understanding Wood Science. It’s a real delight for the Trust to be supporting the WCTE and to create this exciting capacity building opportunity for up-and-coming engineering professionals. Further details and the application form are on the website at https://gottsteintrust.org/grants-courses/wcte-2025-scholarships Applications will close at midnight on 30 March and can be lodged any time before then, through the online form.  

Country wood chops and the Melbourne Royal Show are relying on logs being brought in from interstate or resorting to lesser preferred tree species in a bid to head off the historic sport’s demise. Source: The Weekly Times Victorian Axemen’s Association president Brad Meyer said the sport, which was first held at the Melbourne Show in 1911, could become another casualty of the state’s timber harvesting shutdown. “The problem is now more real than it has ever been,” he said. Mr Meyer said whatever reserves existed when the timber industry closure was brought forward by six years in 2023 had almost dried up, with three major events left for the season ending in June. Alpine ash logs, the preferred wood for competition, were sourced from areas previously managed by VicForests. But Mr Meyer said wood chops were being held with lesser-standard species including pine, messmate, mountain ash and flooded gum. “We’re scratching and scraping for every little bit of log we can get,” he said. “Having to ‘beg, borrow or steal’ is pretty much what we’ve had to do. “But we’re now running into dead ends. “Once we stop running these shows, generally they don’t come back.” In response to the shrinking supply, the Melbourne Royal Show has gone from nine competition days to only four in the past two years with logs sourced from Tasmania. “The wood from Tassie for us to buy and use is just too expensive,” Mr Meyer said. “NSW have got their own hassles of getting wood. “The haulage to get it from somewhere like Eden to central Victoria would just kill us. “We’ve written to every politician there is to write to. But the government is not really that interested in helping us out, to be honest.” The wood chop is one of the main attractions of the Mighty Mitta Muster that is being held again this weekend. Event co-ordinator Richard Piper said a stockpile it sourced when the timber industry shut down was dwindling. “We went ahead and purchased some extra logs when they were available,” he said. “But when that runs out, we don’t know what the future is. It’s a huge attraction and for some of the smaller shows it is the main event. “We’ve also had to limit the numbers of competitors by going from three down to two heats. Previously we would have been open to anyone who wanted to come.”

Approvals for new homes in Australia increased in January, a month before the cash rate was cut. The Australian Bureau of Statistics released its monthly building approvals data for January 2025 for detached houses and multi-units covering all states and territories. Source: Timberbiz There were 16,580 residential dwellings approved in January which was 6.3% higher compared with December 2024. Total dwelling approvals in the three months to January 2025 were 14.0% higher compared with the same quarter in the previous year, with detached approvals up by 6.1% and multi-units up by 27.3%. “These increases in approvals signal positive momentum heading into the new year, with households slowly returning to the market and building new homes,” HIA economist Maurice Tapang said. “New housing approvals had been strengthening on the back of low levels of unemployment, recovering real wages and ongoing strong population growth, even before the first interest rate cut was delivered,” he said. “The rise in detached house approvals has been geographically dispersed, with Queensland, South Australia and Western Australia driving the national gain.” Detached house approvals in in the three months to January 2025 were up in Western Australia by 29.2% compared with the same time in 2024 in South Australia up by 27.5%, and in Queensland up by 13.9%. House approvals in New South Wales fell by 9.5% over the same period because of the high cost of land and delivering new housing, particularly in Sydney. “Victoria continued to see a flat result, with house approvals down by 0.9% over the same period,” Mr Tapang said. “This does not bode well for meeting ongoing growth in demand.” Multi-unit approvals have increased from very weak levels. Mr Tapang said that this needed to double from the 12-year lows of recent years to meet housing targets but constraints on land, construction and investment remain barriers. “The rise in home building activity will be more evident in states and regions with lower land costs and lower taxes on new homes, while those with higher tax imposts will remain weak,” he said. “Despite modest improvements in housing approvals, Australia continues to face a significant shortfall in housing supply.” HIA is calling on the Australian Government in the lead-up to the Federal Election 2025 to help remove barriers to new housing supply. Detached house approvals in the three months to January 2025 were up by 29.2% compared to the previous year in Western Australia, followed by South Australia (+27.5%) and Queensland (+13.9%). The Northern Territory saw a large 86.5% increase over the same period, albeit off historically low levels. The other jurisdictions recorded declines, led by the Australian Capital Territory (-50.4%), followed by New South Wales (-9.5%), Tasmania (-7.0%) and Victoria (-0.9%).  

Much has been made in Australia of the plight of one if its iconic animals – the Koala. This lovable creature has been adored worldwide, and has been the subject of children’s books, video, TV and media stories since settlement of Australia in 1788. While we fully support the protection of Australian Native flora and fauna, we do not support the current process of conservation and political activists in misusing and misrepresenting our native environment to promote hidden agendas that are not in our national interest. The current process of emotional political activism to raise funds worldwide for an apparently at-risk species can be labelled a form of emotional fraud, using misinformation and selected data. Most of this does not rely on fact or science. The koala is now portrayed in the media as being critically endangered, maybe extinct by 2050 if current land clearing and native forestry harvesting practices continue. This view is pushed by conservationists and extremists using the now out of date NSW Senate report of over 10 years ago that reported (and assumed to be fact rather than an opinion) that koalas would be extinct by 2050 if something was not done. This is far removed from the truth. They conveniently do not refer to numerous subsequent science-based research findings through credible field data that factually indicate that koala populations are healthy and growing: The most recent CSIRO findings indicate koala numbers have multiplied at least 10 times in the last 12 years. The NSW Dept of Primary Industry recent findings show koala population growth and forestry selective harvesting can and does co-exist. Previous findings by the Natural Resources Commission that harvesting in native state forest has no negative impact on koala populations. Recent reports provided to the proposed Great Koala Park enquiry indicate more than 12000 koalas exist in the native forest area being considered for the park, which has been managed and harvested for over 200 years. If you are brave enough to speak your mind on the matter you run the risk of being ridiculed   by the hardline activists and   various media outlets, sympathetic to their cause and the emotive responses that create news. You can be labelled a “koala killer” because you do not support their views. Those promoting locking up more land are doing a major disservice to both flora and fauna protection and degrading the intelligence of the general public, and people who actually know how to manage forests. This is a major con job/form of deception. Let’s consider the drive for the new Great Koala National Park (GKNP). The most recent study indicates koala numbers are very healthy in the 175,000 hectares being considered – in excess of 12,000 as stated above. Of course, supporters of the park will say this is precisely the reason to lock it up. However, it begs the question – If koalas are thriving in this environment managed by forestry for over 200 years, why make it a National Park fraught with all the dangers of megafires, unmanaged undergrowth and fuel build ups just waiting to explode? Just look at what is happening in the National Park Estate now with uncontrollable fires. It is understood   part of the argument for the park is to join up the existing adjacent national parks and to provide a safe corridor for koala travel.  This also creates a joined pathway for fires to travel – so you are actually adding fuel to the fire, making potential megafires, rather than being able to isolate and separate.  With this approach you (Govt, conservationists and activists) are in fact providing a recipe to destroy the existing koala population. You are becoming the “koala killers” as compared to foresters and responsible landholders who value their natural resources, the environment and look after it. To say Forestry Corporation who manages the 12% of the state available for native timber harvesting runs the native hardwood Industry at a loss is a very convenient argument. You need to take the whole industry into account from source, right through the supply chain to the end user to determine the ultimate viability, including the communities and jobs in question. Let’s not  destroy  the lives and jobs  of up to 22000 people in regional communities , and destroy a 2.9 billion renewable sustainable  industry in  NSW  in the process, and increase the cost of  living and cost of housing as well, through further reliance  on imports from non-regulated  countries (now exceeding $5 billion in NSW) , and further the reliance on  non-carbon friendly  alternative products (e.g. steel, concrete, plastic). None of this makes commonsense and is another form of deception. We should recognise the massive resources forestry supply in managing fires both in and out of National Parks, managing the road systems in forestry, of which many lead to and through National Parks. Further public examination is needed to look at what the current public spending is on National parks and crown lands/reserves, which represents 88% of the Forestry estate, while the harvestable area available is only 12%. Let’s determine what the spend should be to properly maintain them, as well as do proper ongoing studies on providing data on wildlife sustainability and the mortality level in these parks. When you look at where the koala and other wildlife were destroyed in past fires you must also look at the destruction in the national park estate and how that has contributed to the whole picture. Forest harvesting and management is not a cause for loss of habitat or a cause of loss through fires but is part of the solution. It is common knowledge that many of the megafires that devastated the state of NSW in 2019 originated in National Parks and spread out of control into state forests and private property, causing untold damage, loss of human life and private assets, as well as to native flora and fauna. Little has been done since to address this. This then begs the question of what are we achieving in […]