Bio-fuel levy the last straw for NZ forest owners

A NZ Government decision to make big companies pay for some of their greenhouse gas emissions when using wood pellets and other biofuels is seen as the last straw by many in the forest industry. Reports Friday Off Cuts

“The rest of the developed world is desperately trying to reduce its use of fossil fuels like coal and oil. Sustainable biofuels like wood pellets are being strongly encouraged,” says Forest Owners Association chief executive David Rhodes.

“In New Zealand, our government is going to make some users of sustainable biofuels measure and pay for the tiny traces of methane and nitrous oxide they emit from their boilers. Yet these make up only 0.3% of the country’s energy emissions and 0.13% of its total emissions.” Mr Rhodes acknowledges that the proposed 5000 tonne threshold means only a handful of very large emitters - such as the big pulp and paper mills - will have to buy carbon credits to cover these emissions, but he says the message sent by the policy comes across loud and clear.

“Forest owners see the government on behalf of taxpayers picking up the tab for the 1.2 million tonnes of methane generated by livestock each year. Then they hear the same government demanding payment from users of biofuels for generating relatively trivial amounts of the gas.”

“The message that comes across to forest owners is that the government cannot be relied upon to develop an emissions trading scheme that is fair and rational; one that rewards good behaviour and makes polluters pay. Forestry is clearly one of the good guys of climate change. But it is little wonder that many in our sector have lost confidence in the ETS.”

He says the decision to set an emission charge for biofuels follows hard on the heels of a signal from government that NZ carbon credits may not be tradable outside Australasia if the government aligns its emission trading scheme with Australia’s. “If forest owners are limited to selling their credits on the Australasian market, emitting industries in Australia and New Zealand will be the only buyers. Given that our major emitters are being featherbedded for the foreseeable future, there will be little demand for the credits and their value will be well below the world carbon price.”

“Since forest owners at harvest will have to repay at the full world price for the credits they earned while their trees were growing, why would they accept anything less than the full market price if they sell? Unless this changes, new forests won’t get planted and forest credits won’t be offered for sale.” Source: NZ Forest Owners Association

Copyright:

Issued by:  InternationalForestIndustries

Author:

e-Mail:

Issue date: November 13, 2009

Link to Article: Origin of this text